I just
finished attending my first Glopent
conference, the 8th international meeting of the European Research Network on Global
Pentecostalism. The conference was held at SOAS,
University of London.
The conference
theme was "Pentecostalism and Development" and featured plenary
addresses by Matthew Clark (Deakin University, Australia), Tomas Sundnes Drønen
(School of Mission and Theology in Stravanger, Norway), and Dena Freeman
(visiting fellow at the London School of Economics).
The
conference attempted to address a number of questions about the relationship
between Pentecostalism in the so-called "developing world" and how
scholars understand and interpret what is happening.
The various
speakers and papers in parallel sessions raised a number of excellent
questions. For example, one of the basic issues revolves around the
relationship between Pentecostals and development agencies, how they view that
relationship, who get's to define the role religion plays, and as Matthew Clark
argued, whether or not they see that relationship as one of mutual and shared
concern. My view is that the suspicion Pentecostals have towards
development agencies accounts for the large amount of work that
Pentecostals do themselves, which bypasses state sponsored development work.
Tomas
Sundnes Drønen offered a rich ethnographic description of small, primarily
rural Pentecostal churches in northern Cameroon struggling to gain acceptance
by government authorities, negotiating identities with larger more
accepted Lutheran Churches, and the fascinating ways in which Pentecostals
desire to be successful like their Muslim counterparts. I appreciated his focus
on the mosaic of Pentecostalism and the various small rural churches often lost
in the shadow of the megachurches of America and Nigeria.
Finally,
Dena Freeman offered an account of the conversion of Ethiopians to Pentecostalism,
which included the rupture of continuity with traditional life. And yet, these
Ethiopian Pentecostals have gained new social identities, successful
businesses, and for development workers, new models for expanding projects.
There is
more that could be said about the conference and I'm still processing the many
rich ideas I hope to apply to my own work. Questions like, what constitutes the
social good? What is social engagement? How do we understand the role of
religion and civil society? What is the social impact of religion and what
benefit does religion contribute to community cohesion and citizenship? How
might Pentecostals contribute to public policy and development? What
happens when development projects fail? Or politically, when the goals,
motives, and outcomes differ between development agencies and faith based
organizations?
If you've never attended a Glopent conference, I strongly recommend it.
If you've never attended a Glopent conference, I strongly recommend it.
Comments