From the Center to the Margin and Back Again: Can Pentecostal Studies Learn from the Sociology of Religion?
Early sociological thinkers all wrote about
religion and society and how religion offered important insights into social
processes, systems, ritual, civil society, power and authority, leadership, and
a host of other topics. By the middle of the twentieth century religion moved
to a marginal position. This was due to several factors. One was a shift among
sociologists toward issues of methodology. Some also thought secularization was
occurring and religion would ultimately disappear leaving them to wonder how
religion fit into larger studies. But it was also because social scientific
studies of religion ceased to make important links between their work and the
broader field of sociology. Detailed studies of denominations and
congregations, while descriptively rich, failed to connect with the broader
issues of social change, culture, and society. Sociologists of religion became
more cloistered with well-attended meetings and presentations of excellent
research. The problem was, no one outside the specialization was paying
attention.
Pentecostal studies is also at a
crossroads. Like the sociology of religion at mid-century, it is slowly being
marginalized as some retreat from the important issues in their disciplines. In
the 1990s a number of scholars researched Pentecostalism and raised its profile
as they saw links between the movement and broader social shifts. Harvey Cox and David Martin,
for example, saw key links between shifts in the nature of religious practice and
broader social change. Cox presented his
findings at many different academic societies, one being the Society for
Pentecostal Studies (SPS). SPS benefited from the scholarly engagement between
their members, who are mostly church based researchers, and the broader
academic world. Recent meetings, however, have lost something of the edge these
scholars brought to the meetings. An ongoing discussion about SPS as a
“faith-based” research group holding to a faith statement is also making some
wonder about its role. While members of
SPS offer excellent, rich detailed studies of Pentecostal theology,
congregations, and practices, the ability to link their work to the broader
issues raised in their respective disciplines remains a challenge. Otherwise,
Pentecostal studies generally, and SPS particularly, will have a greater test
to make their work legitimate.
Comments